"It is right for people to be compensated for injuries sustained as a result of a company knowingly allowing their products to be dangerous without fair warning to the customer."
"Stella Liebeck's burn injuries from McDonald's coffee cost her at least $160,000."
"Stella Liebeck's burn injuries from McDonald's coffee were the result of McDonald's knowingly allowing the coffee to be served too hot."
"Stella Liebeck did not have fair warning that McDonald's coffee could result in burn injuries such as the ones she received."
The statement above does not appear in any challenges, supports, or specifications of other statements.
To show you're not a robot, answer the following question:
What is 3 + 3?
Create Login
What is 5 + 2?