“It was right for Stella Liebeck to be compensated the $160,000 that she was awarded by the judge and jury from McDonald's over burns from their coffee.”

Report

Challenges

This statement has no challenges.

Supports

Support

Premise

"It is right for people to be compensated for injuries sustained as a result of a company knowingly allowing their products to be dangerous without fair warning to the customer."

Premise

"Stella Liebeck's burn injuries from McDonald's coffee cost her at least $160,000."

Premise

"Stella Liebeck's burn injuries from McDonald's coffee were the result of McDonald's knowingly allowing the coffee to be served too hot."

Premise

"Stella Liebeck did not have fair warning that McDonald's coffee could result in burn injuries such as the ones she received."

Specifications

This statement has no specifications.

Questions

This statement has not been suggested as an answer to a question.

Connect to question

Used for

The statement above does not appear in any challenges, supports, or specifications of other statements.