Someone marked this logically complete.
"Original statement is extremely vauge"
View
People disagree whether this argument is logically complete. Do you think it is?
"People who commit mass shootings are not likely to follow any new gun laws, so new laws will not likely affect the yearly number of mass shootings. Most mass shootings and the overwhelming majority of gun homocides are committed with illegally procured handguns in urban areas that already have stringent gun laws. What new gun control laws would change this?"
View
"People who commit mass shootings will easily be able to circumvent any new gun laws."
View
"If people who commit mass shootings circumvent new gun laws, those laws will not likely affect the yearly number of mass shootings."
View
Logically complete challenge?
"People who commit mass shootings will easily be able to circumvent any new gun laws."
View
It is NOT the case that "New gun laws will reduce mass shootings in ways other than preventing shooters from obtaining guns."
View
"New gun laws will not deter shooters from obtaining guns unless they are hard to circumvent."
View
How much can new gun laws reduce mass shootings?
View
The statement above does not appear in any challenges, supports, or specifications of other statements.